Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >>The reason I'm hesitant to add a bunch more cross-type operators is
> >>mainly that we have too darn many operators named "=" already.  I've
> >>seen in recent profiling tests that it's taking the parser a noticeable
> >>amount of time to decide which one is meant. 
> 
> Speaking of parsers, did anyone else notice that gcc in its latest 
> release has ripped out the bison based parser for C and Objective-C in 
> favor of a hand cut RD parser?

Yeah, I did.  I wonder what sort of effort they went to write the new
parser.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support