Re: new feature: LDAP database name resolution
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-02-20T14:33:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:36:42PM +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote: > $ psql -h host -p port -d database ..... > you'd use something like > $ psql -N dbalias ... > and the client would perform a lookup on the LDAP server and > retrieve host name, port and database name. I suggest you look at pgpool, which sort of does this for you (possibly automatically). > I am aware that adding such a feature requires changes at many > levels: libpq, psql, libecpg, ecpg, a --with-ldap flag in configure > and probably some more. I doubt it. You need a proxy; you don't need this built into the code. Think of the way UNIX does things: small tools that each do one job, piped together. A connection dispatcher should be pretty cheap, and those who have reported success with pgpool have remarked on how lightweight it is. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler