Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Rick Gigger <rick@alpinenetworking.com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-02-08T02:00:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:44:24AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >This would apply to only a single relation, so would be just as > >efficient a write to the database as to WAL. The proposed route is to > >sync to the database, but not to WAL, thus halving the required I/O. > > > >Yes, its designed for large data loads. > > > A question - would setting fsync=off while restoring a multi-gig dump > (during an upgrade) improve performance? Yes. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461