Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>, John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-05-19T16:15:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > >On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote: > >>The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we say, > >>"interesting" open source projects and using these products with > >>PostgreSQL would be a plus. > > > >The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL > >licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support > >because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program > >needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to > >distribute postgresql support. > > Why would that be the case... OpenSSL and PostgreSQL both are BSD > licensed... Am I missing something? Advertising clause. PostgreSQL doesn't have it, OpenSSL does. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support