Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?

Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>

From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Carlos Benkendorf <carlosbenkendorf@yahoo.com.br>
Date: 2005-12-15T23:44:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:20:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given the rather lackadaisical way in which the stats collector makes
> the data available, it seems like the backends are being much too
> enthusiastic about posting their stats_command_string status
> immediately.  Might be worth thinking about how to cut back the
> overhead by suppressing some of these messages.

Would a GUC setting akin to log_min_duration_statement be feasible?
Does the backend support, or could it be easily modified to support,
a mechanism that would post the command string after a configurable
amount of time had expired, and then continue processing the query?
That way admins could avoid the overhead of posting messages for
short-lived queries that nobody's likely to see in pg_stat_activity
anyway.

-- 
Michael Fuhr