Re: How much expensive are row level statistics?
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Carlos Benkendorf <carlosbenkendorf@yahoo.com.br>
Date: 2005-12-15T23:44:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:20:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Given the rather lackadaisical way in which the stats collector makes > the data available, it seems like the backends are being much too > enthusiastic about posting their stats_command_string status > immediately. Might be worth thinking about how to cut back the > overhead by suppressing some of these messages. Would a GUC setting akin to log_min_duration_statement be feasible? Does the backend support, or could it be easily modified to support, a mechanism that would post the command string after a configurable amount of time had expired, and then continue processing the query? That way admins could avoid the overhead of posting messages for short-lived queries that nobody's likely to see in pg_stat_activity anyway. -- Michael Fuhr