Horton

Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org, Jim Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2005-10-31T18:01:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > If you go for a new state code, rather than a separate
> > boolean, does it reduce the size of the patch?
> 
> No, and it certainly wouldn't improve my level of confidence in it ...

Well, then what real options do we have?  It seems the patch is just
required for all branches.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073