Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
From: Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
To: scrappy@postgresql.org (Marc G. Fournier)
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com (Joshua D. Drake), pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian), matt@jobsforge.com (Matthew Terenzio), pgsql-general@postgresql.org (PgSQL General)
Date: 2005-10-13T03:06:55Z
Lists: pgsql-general
> Stupid question here ... if Oracle came at us with "the Software Patent > crap", is there any "reasonable time" provided to remove it? We've > already shown in the past that that isn't a big hurdle, with the ARC > stuff, so am just curiuos as to how big a thing the Patent stuff is, or > does even that fall under 'temporary setback / inconvience'? That may depend on what's been patented. In my opinions (and more importantly in the eyes of more than a few intellectual property attorneys) the patent office has granted some very dubious software patents, and a deep pockets patent holder would probably have the upper hand wielding them. -- Mike Nolan