Re: Oracle buys Innobase

On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:11:54PM -0700, felix@crowfix.com wrote:
> 
> What am I missing?

[ many answers ]

Ahhh ... I did not realize they were selling a commercial version with
a dual license.  I had thought they were selling support contracts.

I confess I find this weird too.  I can't see why someone wouild want
to distribute their own private label version of MySQL, unless they
were making significant changes, and then I can't see why anyone would
want to buy such a version.  But I have met many people, not just
corporate types, who think $0 = worthless, and $$ not as good as
$$$$$$, even for the exact same piece of gear.

-- 
            ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
     Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
  GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E  6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o