Re: UTF8 or Unicode

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-02-25T18:36:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:26 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > OK, but what about latin1?
> 
> The following character set names are specified in the SQL standard and 
> therefore somewhat non-negotiable:
> 
> SQL_CHARACTER
> GRAPHIC_IRV
> LATIN1
> ISO8BIT
> UTF16
> UTF8
> UCS2
> SQL_TEXT
> SQL_IDENTIFIER
> 
> So we have to use LATIN1, even though it creates an inconsistency.  We 
> discussed this a while ago during the last great renaming, I think.
> 

Oh, UTF8 and not UTF-8?  I thought UTF-8 was the standard name, but if
ANSI uses UTF8 we will have to use that.

> Btw., I think ISO8BIT is the correct name for what we call SQL_ASCII, but I 
> haven't analyzed that in detail, yet.

OK, please let us know.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073