Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: "Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>, Ragnar Hafstað <gnari@simnet.is>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Date: 2005-01-25T16:58:37Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Peter, Ragnar, > > Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections > > to send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds > > apart? > > Using Apache/Perl I often have a situation where we're sending several > queries from the same user (web client) within seconds, or even > simultaneously, that use different connections. So from the sound of it, the connection methods I've been using are the exception rather than the rule. Darn, it worked well for us. :-( What this would point to is NOT being able to use Slony-I for database server pooling for most web applications. Yes? Users should look to pgCluster and C-JDBC instead. BTW, Tatsuo, what's the code relationship between pgPool and pgCluster, if any? --Josh -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco