Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Date: 2005-01-24T17:52:40Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tatsuo, > > Depends on your connection pooling software, I suppose. Most connection > > pooling software only returns connections to the pool after a user has > > been inactive for some period ... generally more than 3 seconds. So > > connection continuity could be trusted. > > Not sure what you mean by "most connection pooling software", but I'm > sure that pgpool behaves differently. Ah, clarity problem here. I'm talking about connection pooling tools from the client (webserver) side, such as Apache::DBI, PHP's pg_pconnect, Jakarta's connection pools, etc. Not pooling on the database server side, which is what pgPool provides. Most of these tools allocate a database connection to an HTTP/middleware client, and only release it after a specific period of inactivity. This means that you *could* count on "web-user==connection" for purposes of switching back and forth to the master -- as long as the connection-recycling timeout were set higher than the pgPool switch-off period. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco