Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: "Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, darcy@wavefire.com, jd@www.commandprompt.com, sfrost@snowman.net, herve@elma.fr, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-01-22T00:34:39Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Peter, Tatsuo: would happen with SELECT queries that, through a function or some > other mechanism, updates data in the database? Would those need to be > passed to pgpool in some special way? Oh, yes, that reminds me. It would be helpful if pgPool accepted a control string ... perhaps one in a SQL comment ... which indicated that the statement to follow was, despite appearances, an update. For example: --STATEMENT_IS_UPDATE\n The alternative is, of course, that pgPool direct all explicit transactions to the master ... which is a good idea anyway. So you could do: BEGIN; SELECT some_update_function(); COMMIT; -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco