Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2005-09-14T16:19:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom, et al., Updated, with full recompiles between everything and the new modification: N, runtime: Tip: 1 31s 2 37s 4 86s 8 159s no-cmpb: 1 32s 2 43s 4 83s 8 168s spin: 1 32s 2 51s 4 84s 8 160s spin+mod: 1 32s 2 51s 4 89s 8 158s spin+no-cmpb: 1 32s 2 51s 4 87s 8 163s spin+mod+no-cmpb: 1 32s 2 50s 4 86s 8 161s Unfortunately, the results don't seem to be terribly consistent between runs anyway: Run 2: Tip: 1 32s 2 43s 4 87s 8 160s no-cmpb: 1 31s 2 47s 4 83s 8 167s spin: 1 32s 2 52s 4 88s 8 154s spin+no-cmpb: 1 32s 2 51s 4 102s 8 166s spin+mod: 1 32s 2 53s 4 85s 8 154s spin+mod+no-cmpb: 1 32s 2 51s 4 91s 8 161s Hope it helps, Stephen