Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> > Thanks.  If you've got the time, could you try the two patches
> > separately and see what you get?
> 
> Sure.
[...]

Just to be clear- this was from a completely default 'make install' 
using the Debian configure options from 8.0.3 (which aren't that 
particularly interesting really- nls, integer-datetimes, debug, 
disable-rpath, tcl, perl, python, pam, krb5, openssl, gnu-ld, 
enable-thread-safety).  If it'd be useful for the test I can adjust 
whichever parameters are appropriate (work_mem, cache_size, etc).

There's absolutely nothing else going on except for these test, a few
shells, top, etc, on the box.

	Enjoy,

		Stephen