Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-08-26T22:36:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
What everybody else said. :) But if it comes to voting... Anything to improve parallelism is good. Anything reducing blocking (ie: CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL) is good Improved handling of sort_mem (I think this will hit bizgres first) merge :) STATISTICS ON INDEXES! (specifically multi-field indexes) Multiple query plans for bound parameters. Materialized views. I don't know the history behind why Slony is trigger-based, but I think both materialized views and replication would benefit greatly from having a means to tie into WAL (or something similar) instead of using triggers. I would expect this to result in a dramatic speed improvement over triggers, since you would no longer be double-logging. A slick way to do this would be to tie-in to WAL writes that meet certain criteria (namely that they hit a specified table) and store those seperately on-disk. These would be played-back as needed. This mechanism should be useful for both replication and MViews. If you look at one of Oracle's replicaiton options, it's actually just a form of MViews that are on remote machines. Even if we stick with something trigger-based for now I think we should provide a base mechanism that works for both MViews and replication. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461