Re: Must be owner to truncate?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2005-07-30T03:15:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Jim C. Nasby (decibel@decibel.org) wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:48:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I don't really agree with the viewpoint that truncate is just a quick
> > > DELETE, and so I do not agree that DELETE permissions should be enough
> > > to let you do a TRUNCATE.
> > 
> > What about adding a truncate permission? I would find it useful, as it
> > seems would others.
> 
> That would be acceptable for me as well.  I'd prefer it just work off
> delete, but as long as I can grant truncate to someone w/o giving them
> ownership rights on the table I'd be happy.

Added to TODO:

	* Add TRUNCATE permission
	
	  Currently only the owner can TRUNCATE a table because triggers are not
	  called, and the table is locked in exclusive mode.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073