Horton

Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved

Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>

View thread
From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-07-11T15:51:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:41:35PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> When I saw that only 0.9.7[efg] have new signature I even
> considered macrofying that.  But now with 0.9.8 again different
> I really would like to not to touch it, as I have no idea which
> one will be the stable signature.
> 
> Comments?

Sounds like a question for the OpenSSL developers.  If a search
through their list archives or CVS repository doesn't yield the
answer, then maybe asking the question on one of their lists will.

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/