Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Marc Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org>
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>, Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-11-04T02:33:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >> Here is a vacuum verbose on gborg's database: > >> INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7454 pages stored; 23072 total pages needed >> DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared memory. >> and this is portal: > >> INFO: free space map: 1000 relations, 7425 pages stored; 23024 total pages needed >> DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1000 relations + 20000 pages = 178 kB shared memory. > >> so, you tell me ... should I increase them? > > Yup. 20000 < 23072, so you're losing some proportion of FSM entries. > What's worse, the FSM relation table is maxed out (1000 = 1000) which > suggests that there are relations not being tracked at all; you have > no idea how much space is getting leaked in those. 'k, increased to 25000/1500, and am runninga vacuum on all databases now ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664