Re: Nearing final release?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-10-17T00:31:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > It seems most logical to me to break the fundamental operations into:
> > 1.  Prepare to create the compiled query plan
> > 2.  Describe to bind the query input/output parameters
> > 3.  Execute to produce a result set
> >
> > Or equivalent functionality.  Then, you can bind all three parts into
> > one operation if you want to, or you can execute the tasks separately.
> >
> > The notion of a flag to tell whether to return a result set or not has 
> > a
> > smell of kludge to me.
> >
> > On the other hand, if getting something working in a hurry is the main
> > purpose, then a flag might be the best way to go, and it could be more
> > carefully refactored later.
> 
> FWIW, is libpq going to have its version bumped?  There's some interest 
> in having this done from the FreeBSD camp because it make detecting 
> installed verions of libpq much easier (7.4 client libs working with an 
> 8.0 server?).  In FreeBSD the server is split from the client programs 
> and its libs.  I'm sure other packagers may wish to see this happen 
> too.  *shrug*  -sc

We do a minor libpq version bump for every major PostgreSQL release.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073