Horton

Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2004-10-02T17:41:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-novice, pgsql-sql 
Tom Lane wrote:
> What I'm inclined to do with these is change pg_proc.h but not force
> an initdb.  Does anyone want to argue for an initdb to force it to be
> fixed in 8.0?  We've lived with the wrong labelings for some time now
> without noticing, so it doesn't seem like a serious enough bug to
> force a post-beta initdb ... to me anyway.

I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog.  
I don't want to ask users, "what version, and when did you last 
initdb".  We're still in beta; no one purchased any stability 
guarantees.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/