Horton

Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)

Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2004-10-02T00:50:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-novice, pgsql-sql 
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 18:53:03 -0400,
  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> What I'm inclined to do with these is change pg_proc.h but not force an
> initdb.  Does anyone want to argue for an initdb to force it to be fixed
> in 8.0?  We've lived with the wrong labelings for some time now without
> noticing, so it doesn't seem like a serious enough bug to force a
> post-beta initdb ... to me anyway.

As long as it is mentioned in the release notes, it doesn't seem worth
forcing an initdb.