Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Matthew T. O'Connor <matthew@zeut.net>
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>
To: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
Cc: David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-25T04:13:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 06:03 pm, Dustin Sallings wrote: > There's not a lot of GUI in arch, but star-merge is fairly incredible. > This is how tla (the main arch implementation) itself is developed. > Lots of branches in lots of archives by lots of people. I would guess that better merging might be a real motivation for people. If a patch that takes a month to develop can still apply cleanly despite significant code drift in the interrem, I could see that as a real motivating factor. Matthew