Re: I can't upgrade to PostgreSQL 7.4 in RedHat 9.0

Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>

From: Martín Marqués <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Cc: Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>, Manuel Tejada <mantemu@terra.com.pe>, Ericson Smith <eric@did-it.com>, Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-02-02T18:10:27Z
Lists: pgsql-general
El Lun 02 Feb 2004 14:47, Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:04:49PM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
> > Why not? I don' t see much difference from other distributions, and at the 
> > end, if you want a real server you have to go through all the 
configuration 
> > to make sure it's going to have good performaces.
> 
> Fedora Core releases have too short a lifetime, by definition.  You
> don't want to be upgrading your servers every 6 months, do you?  I'd
> prefer something that gives me some more time before I have to consider
> it obsolete.  RHEL is a good example; I think they give you 3 years, 5
> for RHAS (is this right?).  Debian, Mandrake, FreeBSD o OpenBSD give me
> a lot more confidence than FC because of this.

Well, one thing is for sure: It has to short of a life time. :-)

Anyway, even if they did say that the intention was to have three releases a 
year, I can't imagine them even been able to make two. FC1 came by beginning 
of November, and even if they have said there will be a second release in 
May, I doubt they are going to make it before July.

Anyway I have to see how the upgrades perform, because depending on that is 
how bad an idea it is to upgrade each 6 months (RedHat had some bad upgrade 
issues in the past).

-- 
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
---------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués          |   Programador, DBA
Centro de Telemática	|     Administrador
               Universidad Nacional
                    del Litoral
---------------------------------------------------------