Re:
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org>
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>, David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-05-24T00:42:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 23 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes: > > There will always be people who won't read the notes, or ignore the > > notes, > > Does anyone want to contemplate hacking things so that the Windows port > reports a different version number? "0.1" might give people the right > sort of impression about what we think of that port's stability ... How about a pop-up when starting up that repeatedly reinforces that this is considered a early port, and should be treated as such in a production environment. When we have it to the point we consider stable, we remove teh popup? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664