Re: Wierd context-switching issue on Xeon
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com, Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Dirk_Lutzebäck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>, ohp@pyrenet.fr, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Date: 2004-05-20T04:11:05Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
OK, added to TODO: * Investigate SMP context switching issues --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> ... The SMP issue seems to be not with whether there is > >> instantaneous contention for the locked datastructure, but with the cost > >> of making it possible for processor B to acquire a lock recently held by > >> processor A. > > > I see. I don't even see a TODO in there. :-( > > Nothing more specific than "investigate SMP context switching issues", > anyway. We are definitely in a research mode here, rather than an > engineering mode. > > ObQuote: "Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am > doing." - attributed to Werner von Braun, but has anyone got a > definitive reference? > > regards, tom lane > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073