Re: Commercial binary support?
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-19T18:56:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own > > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? > > > > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several > > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL > > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not. > > We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ... And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073