Re: Commercial binary support?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-19T18:56:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is
> > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own
> > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here?
> >
> > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several
> > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL
> > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not.
> 
> We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...

And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073