Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@postgresql.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-19T01:56:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> > HOWEVER, a release cycle of *less than 6 months* would kill the advocacy vols
> > if we wanted the same level of publicity.
> >
> > I do support the idea of "dev" releases.   For example, if there was a "dev"
> > release of PG+ARC as soon as Jan is done with it, I have one client would
> > would be willing to test it against a simulated production load on pretty
> > heavy-duty hardware.
>
> Can't we have nightly builds always available?  Why can't they just use
> the CVS version?

We do do nightly builds ... have for years now ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664