Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com>
From: ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-11-18T16:39:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
--- Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com> wrote: > Which feature is requested more than that? Not sure how often features are requested and by whom. However, if you take a look at the TODO list, you'll find plenty of stuff more important than win32 port. > Of the following (which includes every significant DBMS in terms of > market share), which did not consider a native Windows port to be > important: > SQL*Sever (all right, we can discount this one...) > DB/2 > Oracle > MySQL > Sybase > Informix Have *never* seen ppl running Oracle or Sybase on Windows. Not sure about DB/2 or Informix, never worked with them, but I'd suspect the picture is the same. They may claim that they have win port but it's more of a marketing gimmick than a useful feature that affects real, not hypothetical, users. IMHO, core postgreSql development should not be sacrificed for the sake of win32 port. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree