Re: Changes to Contributor List

Peter,

> Hence my original point: the list of supporting companies
> does not primarily belong in the advocacy realm.

But it does!   You pointed it out yourself .... for the hackers & OSS tech 
people, they can just look at the descriptions of the major contributors and 
figure things out for themselves.   They don't need a list with company logos 
& links.

This is important because we've (people on the Advocacy list) briefly 
discussed expanding this page to cover companies which, in the future, make 
*financial* contributions to PostgreSQL ... sort of a "corporate donors" 
page.   This works very well in standard nonprofit fundraising; the project 
gets $, and the donors get publicity.  Obviously, contributors would have to 
be categorized, but that's an issue for when we're ready to set it up.

> > It is there for IT department managers, PHBs, people considering
> > PostgreSQL, and people looking for high-end paid support.
> 
> Great, that's exactly what I wanted to hear.

I can't tell over e-mail whether you're agreeing with me or being sarcastic.  
Clue?

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco