Re: Recomended FS

Greg Stark wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> 
> > Sweet.  It may be that the promise is turning off the cache, or that the 
> > new generation of IDE drives is finally reporting fsync correctly.  Was 
> > there a performance difference in the set with write cache on or off?
> 
> Check out this thread. It seems the ATA standard does not include any way to
> make fsync work properly without destroying performance. At least on linux
> even that much is impossible without disabling caching entirely as the
> operation required isn't exposed to user-space. There is some hope for the
> future though.
> 
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0310.2/0163.html

I thought the operating system has to write the block and force it to
disk, and that happened the same with SCSI and IDE.  I didn't assume the
drive would associate multiple blocks with the fsync.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073