Re: 2-phase commit

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan writes:
> 
> > Does the proposal of allowing dbas to run that risk, provided there's a
> > mechanism to tell them about it, satisfy the objection (assuming, of
> > course, 2PC can be turned off)?
> 
> Why would you spent time on implementing a mechanism whose ultimate
> benefit is supposed to be increasing reliability and performance, when you
> already realize that it will have to lock up at the slightest sight of
> trouble?  There are better mechanisms out there that you can use instead.

If you want cross-server transactions, what other methods are there that
are more reliable?  It seems network unreliability is going to be a
problem no matter what method you use.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073