Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-03-18T23:15:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 05:18:02PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > What if folks want all their connections autocommit off. > > > > For interactive use, people can record their preferred setting in > > ~/.psqlrc or something like that. > > But that only works for psql, right? How would this be done at the > libpq level? Environment variables? GUC seems a whole lot cleaner. I think an environment variable would be right. The current method is not clean in the sense that a client cannot decide what she wants; she just accepts the decision from the DBA. Thus, an application can't be written with a certain value in mind, because the DBA can change the setting at any time. Client-side decision is the wiser proposal, I think. > I understand. I just don't see any value in pushing that logic into > each client when we can do it centrally in the server. The server doesn't know beforehand what the client wants. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada"