Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-03-18T22:18:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > What if folks want all their connections autocommit off. > > For interactive use, people can record their preferred setting in > ~/.psqlrc or something like that. But that only works for psql, right? How would this be done at the libpq level? Environment variables? GUC seems a whole lot cleaner. > But any non-interactive program is written with a specific autocommit > setting in mind. Either it assumes that single statements are > automatically committed or it issues explicit COMMIT commands. That > means, the choice of autocommit mode is always ultimately determined by > the client, never by the server or its administrator. > > For that very reason most standard interfaces define in their > specification whether applications must assume autocommit behavior or must > not do so. I understand. I just don't see any value in pushing that logic into each client when we can do it centrally in the server. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073