Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-20T22:33:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Robert, > > 1) Location of the pg_xlog for heavy-update databases. > > I see you put this up pretty high on the list. Do you feel this is the > most important thing you can do? For example, if you had a two drive > installation, would you load the OS and main database files on 1 disk > and put the pg_xlog on the second disk above all other configurations? Yes, actually. On machines with 2 IDE disks, I've found that this can make as much as 30% difference in speed of serial/large UPDATE statements. > Ideally I recommend 3 disks, one for os, one for data, one for xlog; but > if you only had 2 would the added speed benefits be worth the additional > recovery complexity (if you data/xlog are on the same disk, you have 1 > point of failure, one disk for backing up) On the other hand, with the xlog on a seperate disk, the xlog and the database disks are unlikely to fail at the same time. So I don't personally see it as a recovery problem, but a benefit. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco