Re: location of the configuration files

Kevin Brown wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The big question is whether PGDATA is still our driving config variable,
> > and PGCONFIG/-C is just an additional option, or whether we are moving
> > in a direction where PGCONFIG/-C is going to be the driving value, and
> > data_dir is going to be read as part of that.
> 
> I'm actually leaning towards PGCONFIG + PGDATA.
> 
> Yeah, it may be a surprise given my previous arguments, but I can't
> help but think that the advantages you get with PGDATA will also exist
> for PGCONFIG.
> 
> My previous arguments for removing PGDATA from postmaster can be dealt
> with by fixing pg_ctl to use explicit command line directives when
> invoking postmaster -- no changes to postmaster needed.  PGCONFIG
> would be no different in that regard.

The following patch propogates pg_ctl -D to the postmaster as a -D flag.
I see no other pg_ctl flags that make sense to propogate.

Applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073