Re: Incremental backup
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Patrick Macdonald <patrickm@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-13T22:56:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Patrick Macdonald wrote: > > But why would someone want incremental backups compared to PITR? The > > backup would be mixture of INSERTS, UPDATES, and DELETES, right? Seems > > pretty weird. :-) > > Yeah, it's a different method of producing a similar outcome. However, many > companies do not want to be concerned with the management (and space) > of archived logs. Incremental backup allows them the option of performing > a full backup and then only backing up the modifications on a regular basis. > When it's time to restore, they'll restore the full backup and then the > proper sequence of incremental backups. Wow, I never even thought that was possible. Do other db's support that feature? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073