Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Cc: justin@postgresql.org, merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-02-14T04:00:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Tatsuo, > Sigh. People always complain "pgbench does not reliably producing > repeatable numbers" or something then say "that's because pgbench's > transaction has too much contention on the branches table". So I added > -N option to pgbench which makes pgbench not to do any UPDATE to > the branches table. But still people continue to complian... Hey, pg_bench is a good start on a Postgres performance tester, and it's much, much better than what there was before you came along ... which was nothing. Thank you again for contributing it. pg_bench is, however, only a start on a performance tester, and we'd need to build it up before we could use it as the basis of a PG tuner. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco