Re: 2-phase commit
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD'" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>, "'Andrew Sullivan'" <andrew@libertyrms.info>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-09-29T14:10:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Master Slave > > ------ ----- > > commit ready--> > > <--OK > > commit done->XX > > > > is the "commit done" message needed ? > > Of course ... how else will the Slave commit? From my understanding, the > concept is that the master sends a commit ready to the slave, but the OK > back is that "OK, I'm ready to commit whenever you are", at which point > the master does its commit and tells the slave to do its ... Or the slave could reject the request. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073