Re: LAST_INSERT_ID equivalent
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com>
Cc: Ericson Smith <eric@did-it.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-06-12T19:26:53Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 15:17:22 -0400, Erik Price <eprice@ptc.com> wrote: > > So you're saying that you perform a pre-query to fetch the nextval, then > you include that in your query where you perform the INSERT? I see. > Since this is all part of the same transaction, the nextval value won't > overwrite another simultaneous INSERT, I assume. This seems like a good > way to do it too. I don't mind the holes in the sequence, but wouldn't > this INSERT cause the sequence to increment the primary key yet again? If you do things that way you specify a value for the serial column rather than let it default to using nextval.