Re: Outstanding patches

I have applied the following doc patch for array_upper/lower().  The
other issues have already been addressed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I will be applying outstanding 7.4 patches on Friday:
> > 	http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
> > If anyone wants those rejected/modified, please let me know.
> 
> array upper/lower bound: missing doc updates, otherwise seems okay.
> 
> \pset pager always: I thought we had rejected that idea in favor of
> making the whether-to-use-pager decision pay attention to width as
> well as number of lines.
> 
> temp tables: difficult to comment on a message that does not include the
> proposed patch.
> 
> CLUSTER ALL patch: I have a problem with this, specifically the fact
> that it changes CLUSTER into a multi-transaction operation.  That
> renders CLUSTER non-rollbackable and not callable from functions.
> After all the work we went to to make CLUSTER rollbackable, this seems
> like a giant step backward.
> 
> CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of
> a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would
> be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion?  I seem to recall
> some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we
> resolved them.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073