Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>, Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2002-10-24T23:43:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > OK, NetBSD added.
> >
> > Any other OS's need this?  Is it safe for me to code something that
> > assumes fpos_t and off_t are identical?  I can't think of a good way to
> > test if two data types are identical.  I don't think sizeof is enough.
> 
> No, you can't assume that fpos_t and off_t are identical.

I was wondering --- if fpos_t and off_t are identical sizeof, and fpos_t
can do shift << or >>, that means fpos_t is also integral like off_t.
Can I then assume they are the same?

> But you can simulate a long fseeko() by calling fseek() multiple times, so
> it should be possible to write a replacement that works on all systems.

Yes, but I can't simulate ftello, so I then can't do SEEK_CUR. and if I
can't duplicate the entire API, I don't want to try.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073