Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>, Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2002-10-24T23:43:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > OK, NetBSD added. > > > > Any other OS's need this? Is it safe for me to code something that > > assumes fpos_t and off_t are identical? I can't think of a good way to > > test if two data types are identical. I don't think sizeof is enough. > > No, you can't assume that fpos_t and off_t are identical. I was wondering --- if fpos_t and off_t are identical sizeof, and fpos_t can do shift << or >>, that means fpos_t is also integral like off_t. Can I then assume they are the same? > But you can simulate a long fseeko() by calling fseek() multiple times, so > it should be possible to write a replacement that works on all systems. Yes, but I can't simulate ftello, so I then can't do SEEK_CUR. and if I can't duplicate the entire API, I don't want to try. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073