Thread

  1. v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 2002-02-04T14:28:18Z

    ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    wrong/missing?
    
    
    
  2. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> — 2002-02-04T14:50:24Z

    On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
    
    >
    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    Appears complete and builds ok.
    
    Vince.
    -- 
    ==========================================================================
    Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net
             56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
            Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com
           Online Giftshop Superstore    http://www.cloudninegifts.com
    ==========================================================================
    
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> — 2002-02-04T15:12:09Z

    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    Just a quick report: looks good and all regression tests passed on my
    Linux (variant of RedHat 6.2).
    --
    Tatsuo Ishii
    
    
  4. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Roberto Andrade Fonseca <randrade@abl.com.mx> — 2002-02-04T15:43:59Z

    El lun, 04-02-2002 a las 08:28, Marc G. Fournier escribió:
    > 
    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    I can see in the /pub/beta directory:
    postgresql-7.2.tar.gz
    
    When will you release it? so I could send a message to the PostgreSQL
    list in Spanish and to cofradia.org, giving the good news.
    
    -- 
    Saludos,
    
    Roberto Andrade Fonseca
    randrade@abl.com.mx
    
    
  5. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2002-02-04T15:51:15Z

    "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    Looks like you didn't insert a tag into the CVS repository?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  6. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    bpalmer <bpalmer@crimelabs.net> — 2002-02-04T17:19:46Z

    Looks good and all checks out on OBSD intel / sparc.
    
    - Brandon
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     c: 646-456-5455                                            h: 201-798-4983
     b. palmer,  bpalmer@crimelabs.net           pgp:crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5
    
    
    
  7. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    bpalmer <bpalmer@crimelabs.net> — 2002-02-04T18:14:21Z

    Also checks out on Solaris8/Sparc.
    
    - Brandon
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     c: 646-456-5455                                            h: 201-798-4983
     b. palmer,  bpalmer@crimelabs.net           pgp:crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5
    
    
    
  8. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Marc Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 2002-02-04T19:05:31Z

    d'oh, knew I missed a step :(
    
    tag'ng that now ... thanks ...
    
    
    On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
    
    > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    > > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > > wrong/missing?
    >
    > Looks like you didn't insert a tag into the CVS repository?
    >
    > 			regards, tom lane
    >
    
    
    
  9. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2002-02-04T23:13:25Z

    "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    
    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    All regression tests are succesful on Red Hat Linux with current
    updates (as long as the locale is set to "C", when different, flaws in
    the test design shows up).
    
    -- 
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    Red Hat, Inc.
    
    
  10. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2002-02-04T23:21:43Z

    teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød) writes:
    
    > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    > 
    > > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > > wrong/missing?
    > 
    > All regression tests are successful on Red Hat Linux with current
    > updates 
    
    RHL 7.2 (bah, forgot to type the version number. It's included in the
    entry in the regresion database, though).
    
    -- 
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    Red Hat, Inc.
    
    
  11. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> — 2002-02-05T03:34:13Z

    > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
    > 
    > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    > > > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > > > wrong/missing?
    
    Are you going to wrap a new package or to release it as is?
    
    I'm going to give a presentation at a big exhibition in Japan the day
    after tommorow. I just want to know 7.2 has been officially released
    or not by the time...
    --
    Tatsuo Ishii
    
    
  12. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2002-02-05T04:30:20Z

    Tatsuo Ishii writes:
    
    > Are you going to wrap a new package or to release it as is?
    >
    > I'm going to give a presentation at a big exhibition in Japan the day
    > after tommorow. I just want to know 7.2 has been officially released
    > or not by the time...
    
    Well, there's a CVS tag and the release notes have a release date of
    February 4th, so I consider it a release.  Maybe it's supposed to be a
    secret?
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
    
    
    
  13. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> — 2002-02-05T13:55:40Z

    Hello,
    
    > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > wrong/missing?
    
    make -j 2
    does not work.
    
    --
    Denis
    
    
  14. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Alessio Bragadini <alessio@albourne.com> — 2002-02-05T14:58:02Z

    Builds fine on alphaev67-dec-osf4.0g, compiled by cc -std
    (Compaq Tru64 4.0g, Compaq cc)
    
    -- 
    Alessio F. Bragadini		alessio@albourne.com
    APL Financial Services		http://village.albourne.com
    Nicosia, Cyprus		 	phone: +357-22-755750
    
    "It is more complicated than you think"
    		-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925
    
    
    
  15. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2002-02-05T15:29:25Z

    Denis Perchine writes:
    
    > Hello,
    >
    > > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > > wrong/missing?
    >
    > make -j 2
    > does not work.
    
    You should know better than to make unsupported claims of "does not work".
    FWIW, it "does work" here.
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
    
    
    
  16. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2002-02-05T15:53:57Z

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
    > Tatsuo Ishii writes:
    >> Are you going to wrap a new package or to release it as is?
    
    > Well, there's a CVS tag and the release notes have a release date of
    > February 4th, so I consider it a release.  Maybe it's supposed to be a
    > secret?
    
    No, it's supposed to be a release ;-).  I think the only reason Marc
    didn't put out an announcement yet is that he likes to give the mirrors
    a full day to get sync'd up before people start hitting the ftp servers.
    I expect to see an announce come by any minute now (right Marc?)
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
  17. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> — 2002-02-05T15:58:53Z

    On Tuesday 05 February 2002 21:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
    > Denis Perchine writes:
    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > > ... can a few of you go take a peak and let me know if anything is
    > > > wrong/missing?
    > >
    > > make -j 2
    > > does not work.
    >
    > You should know better than to make unsupported claims of "does not work".
    > FWIW, it "does work" here.
    
    parallel make errors are mostly timing dependent. Here is the example. RH 6.2
    
    [ec@linux03 postgresql-7.2]$ make -j 2
    make -C doc all
    make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ec/1/postgresql-7.2/doc'
    gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf -
    gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf -
    for file in man1/*.1; do \
      mv $file $file.bak && \
      sed -e 's/\\fR(l)/\\fR(7)/' $file.bak >$file && \
      rm $file.bak || exit; \
    done
    for file in man1/*.1; do \
      mv $file $file.bak && \
      sed -e 's/\\fR(l)/\\fR(7)/' $file.bak >$file && \
      rm $file.bak || exit; \
    done
    rm: cannot remove `man1/createlang.1.bak': No such file or directory
    make[1]: *** [man1/.timestamp] Error 1
    make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ec/1/postgresql-7.2/doc'
    make: *** [all] Error 2
    
    
  18. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2002-02-05T22:34:48Z

    Denis Perchine writes:
    
    > [ec@linux03 postgresql-7.2]$ make -j 2
    > make -C doc all
    > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ec/1/postgresql-7.2/doc'
    > gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf -
    > gzip -d -c man.tar.gz | /bin/tar xf -
    > for file in man1/*.1; do \
    >   mv $file $file.bak && \
    >   sed -e 's/\\fR(l)/\\fR(7)/' $file.bak >$file && \
    >   rm $file.bak || exit; \
    > done
    > for file in man1/*.1; do \
    >   mv $file $file.bak && \
    >   sed -e 's/\\fR(l)/\\fR(7)/' $file.bak >$file && \
    >   rm $file.bak || exit; \
    > done
    > rm: cannot remove `man1/createlang.1.bak': No such file or directory
    
    I see.  We had fixed one case of these flawed multiple-target rules, but I
    guess there are more.  I've identified some other places that could cause
    similar problems.  Expect a fix in the next release.
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
    
    
    
  19. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> — 2002-02-06T09:38:00Z

    Hello,
    
    Another problem with 7.2.
    
    I have considered to migrate from 7.1.3 to 7.2. I have dumped a database using
    pg_dump -Fc. When I tried to restore it using pg_restore, it gives me an 
    error. The problem was that it creates a view before a table it refers to.
    
    If you need more info, just ask,
    
    --
    Denis
    
    
    
  20. Re: v7.2 rolled last night ...

    Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> — 2002-02-06T09:59:20Z

    At 03:38 PM 2/6/02 +0600, Denis Perchine wrote:
    >Hello,
    >
    >Another problem with 7.2.
    >
    >I have considered to migrate from 7.1.3 to 7.2. I have dumped a database
    using
    >pg_dump -Fc. When I tried to restore it using pg_restore, it gives me an 
    >error. The problem was that it creates a view before a table it refers to.
    
    Try dumping it with the 7.2 version of pg_dump, if possible. From memory
    this ordering problem was fixed in a 7.1 patch, but if you are really on
    7.1.3, that seems unlikely.
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
    Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
    (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
    Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
    Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
    Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                     |    --________--
    PGP key available upon request,  |  /
    and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/