Re: [HACKERS] Performance while loading data and indexing
Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>
From: Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>
To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-09-26T15:04:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance, pgsql-general
On Thursday 26 September 2002 21:52, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > I might have found the bottleneck, although by accident. Mysql was running > out of space while creating index. So my friend shut down mysql and tried > to move things by hand to create links. He noticed that even things like cp > were terribly slow and it hit us.. May be the culprit is the file system. > Ext3 in this case. > > My friend argues for ext2 to eliminate journalling overhead but I favour > reiserfs personally having used it in pgbench with 10M rows on paltry 20GB > IDE disk for 25 tps.. > > We will be attempting raiserfs and/or XFS if required. I know how much > speed difference exists between resiserfs and ext2. Would not be surprised > if everythng just starts screaming in one go.. As it was found by someone before any non-journaling FS is faster than journaling one. This due to double work done by FS and database. Try it on ext2 and compare. -- Denis