Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-13T20:39:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

I have applied the attached patch which changes NAMEDATALEN to 64 and
FUNC_MAX_ARGS/INDEX_MAX_KEYS to 32.  Hopefully this will keep people
happy for a few more years.

initdb required.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> > > which one we prefer.
> > >
> > > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> > > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > > problems.
> >
> > I guess I'd also agree with:
> >    FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
> >    NAMEDATALEN 64
> > and work on the performance issues for 7.4.
> 
> I agree too.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073