Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-13T20:39:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- (unnamed) (text/plain)
I have applied the attached patch which changes NAMEDATALEN to 64 and FUNC_MAX_ARGS/INDEX_MAX_KEYS to 32. Hopefully this will keep people happy for a few more years. initdb required. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3. At this point, we better decide > > > which one we prefer. > > > > > > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it > > > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage. If we go to > > > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance > > > problems. > > > > I guess I'd also agree with: > > FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32 > > NAMEDATALEN 64 > > and work on the performance issues for 7.4. > > I agree too. > > Chris > > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073