Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-12T05:06:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Retracted part added. [ I hadn't noticed the retraction.] Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Conway wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > >>Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > > > > >>>There is also a small adjustment to the expected output file for > >>>select-having. I was getting a regression failure based on ordering of > >>>the results, so I added ORDER BY clauses. > >> > > > > Don't forget that that part of the patch was retracted. > > You should be able to simply remove the changes to: > Index: src/test/regress/expected/select_having.out > Index: src/test/regress/sql/select_having.sql > from the patch. > > Or let me know if you want me to do it and resubmit. > > Thanks, > > Joe > > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073