Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-12T05:06:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Retracted part added.  [ I hadn't noticed the retraction.]

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > 
> >>Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> > 
> > 
> >>>There is also a small adjustment to the expected output file for 
> >>>select-having. I was getting a regression failure based on ordering of 
> >>>the results, so I added ORDER BY clauses.
> >>
> > 
> > Don't forget that that part of the patch was retracted.
> 
> You should be able to simply remove the changes to:
>    Index: src/test/regress/expected/select_having.out
>    Index: src/test/regress/sql/select_having.sql
> from the patch.
> 
> Or let me know if you want me to do it and resubmit.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073