Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>

To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>

Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2002-08-11T09:38:56Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> > which one we prefer.
> >
> > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > problems.
>
> I guess I'd also agree with:
>    FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
>    NAMEDATALEN 64
> and work on the performance issues for 7.4.

I agree too.

Chris