Re: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
From: nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)
To: selkovjr@xnet.com
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-08-07T14:46:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 12:41:04AM -0500, selkovjr@xnet.com wrote: > Some of the data structures resemble each other's counterparts; > the only piece that is exactly the same as one of the five > BerkelyDB's hash functions. FYI, the development version of PostgreSQL uses a completely different (and higher quality) hash function. > The only useful experiment that I feel I am capable of making is > trying their __ham_hash5() function, with they claim is generally > better than the other four, for most purposes. I'm skeptical that changing the hash function would make a significant difference to the usability of hash indexes. At the very least, the reproducible deadlocks under concurrent access need to be fixed, as well as a host of other issues. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC