Horton
Menu

Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

View thread
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-04T02:54:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, time to get moving folks.  Looks like the increase in the function
> > args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested.
> 
> I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt
> too much.  But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN?  In
> particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?

No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%?   No, we did a test for 64.
Can someone get us that number for 128?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026