Horton

Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
Date: 2002-05-09T11:51:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:

> > 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> > license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> > development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
>
> Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
> separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?

Ummmm ... no?  We tend to be anti-GPL over here, since its anti-business
... gborg would be a good place for any of this ...