Horton

Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-29T18:52:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > What happens inside of a nested transaction, assuming we do have those
> > evenually ... ?
>
> Folks,
>
>     I  don't  really  get it. We had a voting and I think I saw a
>     clear enough result with #1, transactional behaviour, as  the
>     winner.    Maybe   I   missed   something,  but  what's  this
>     disscussion about?

This discussion is about a #4 option that nobody considered ...